Nexgenwars most improved console this year

[GenSpark]

Originally Posted by Icemage

Search Results from Metacritic.com

Metacritic shows 53 PS3 games with a composite score of 75 or better.

Maybe next time you should do your homework instead of making yourself look ignorant?

So is there less than 100 games on the PS3 ? I've played RC and its not on par with SMG, its alright for a game but nothing spectacular. I think a score of low 80 would be appropriate for the game.

[Fornak]

Also no PS3 exclusive has gone over 90 on metacritic, meanwhile the Wii has 4 and the 360 has 6

[Dax]

Originally Posted by Fornak

Also no PS3 exclusive has gone over 90 on metacritic, meanwhile the Wii has 4 and the 360 has 6

Review scores don't matter.

[Azt3k]

Bu bu bu teh bioshock scores?

[Dax]

Originally Posted by xAztekx

Bu bu bu teh bioshock scores?

bububububu teh Halo scores?
What does it matter? It doesn't. My confidence in video game critics has wavered because of the Jeff incident.

[ltzasz]

Originally Posted by Dax

bububububu teh Halo scores?
What does it matter? It doesn't. My confidence in video game critics has wavered because of the Jeff incident. I

It was there before?

[Dax]

Originally Posted by ltzasz

It was there before?

Well, yeah. Though, I never trusted much of the sites before now, I just mainly looked at IGN, 1up, Gametrailers, and Eurogamer. I guess what I meant to say was it just forces me to think about it now.

[Fornak]

Originally Posted by Dax

Review scores don't matter.

Reviews do matter when the only 3 games on the PS3 higher then 90 are probably better on the 360. =P

[Dax]

Originally Posted by Fornak

Reviews do matter when the only 3 games on the PS3 higher then 90 is probably better on the 360

Your sentence...

[Tag]

I also DID mention people opinion's will differ on what game they like better, but the parts I listed weren't opinion based.

lols everyone else has an opinion except Ed, he speaks the truth, the light, the word of God. But seriously, there is no objective way to measure one game as being better then another. There is no objective way to measure a AAA game. The best method we have is through aggregate review sites like Metacritic and gamerankings, not what Ed or Thom think is or isnt a AAA game, or why they think game mechanics are 'objectively' better in one game than another. If you want to cry media bias or some other type of foul play, thats fine as I said theres no way for something like this to be completely objective. But unless you can produce something better (and not just your personal onions), it's what will be used.