Who has the best games/most exclusives?

[boffo]

Originally Posted by willay

i dont like that statement. i dont know why. but i dont

Sorry. Is "but it doesn't matter if you don't have an interest in most of those exclusives" better?

[Dax]

Originally Posted by willay

i dont like that statement. i dont know why. but i dont

and i think its (in terms of good exclusives) 360>wii>PS3. but, in overall games (which is what really matters), its 360>PS3>wii. and if i had to choose again, id choose PS3, because i really love uncharted, ratchet and clank, resistance, etc... and the only games i want to play on 360 i can play on my PC.

In terms of good exclusives, the PS3 is definitely ahead of the Wii.
EDIT: The PS3 SHOULD be ahead of the Wii IMO.

[Darth Daver]

Originally Posted by Dax

In terms of good exclusives, the PS3 is definitely ahead of the Wii.

Sorry, check again.

[Dax]

Originally Posted by Darth Daver

Sorry, check again.

Double checked and triple checked. Yeah, the PS3 definitely has more.

[Darth Daver]

Originally Posted by Dax

Double checked and triple checked. Yeah, the PS3 definitely has more.

How far do I actually have to go to make you understand simple counting?

Taking released games:
Wii games with a metacritic score of 75 or more = 14
PS3 games with a metacritic score of 75 or more = 7

[TheSwex]

Personally now that I really think about it, there is no way in hell I'm getting a PS3 until it starts getting exlusives that are worth playing and aren't already on the 360. Right now I feel I have the best of both worlds being Wii60.

My issue has never really been with the PS3 itself, but the idiots that work for Sony that marketed the fuckin thing. They figured since the first two Playstations did so well, they could get away with anything. There's no other reason other than arrogance that could have lead them to tag it with a $600 price point.

That's one of the main differences with Sony and Nintendo. Sure they both took risks. Nintendo risked a new control scheme and it has been a hug hit with the world. Say what you will about Wii. You can say it sucks and it has no games and it never will and blah blah blah. You can say some of the waggle is bullshit(and I'll agree). You can say the online is shit(and I will DEFINITELY agree. Fucking awful). One thing its managed to do is unite just about every kind of gamer from the hardcore to the casual. Microsoft and Sony never really appealed to the casuals and that's the reason Wii has sold so damn well. Yes I'm a Nintendo fan and yes I will defend it from time to time. My take is that there are just some people out there who prefer Nintendo to always be the shittiest. Gotta pick on SOMEBODY I guess.

Oh yeah, and I'll say it again. I own a 360, and it's fucking amazing. If there's any bias to me whatsoever, it's currently against PS3. And even THAT bias is dwindling as we speak.

[Dax]

Originally Posted by Darth Daver

How far do I actually have to go to make you understand simple counting?

Taking released games:
Wii games with a metacritic score of 75 or more = 14
PS3 games with a metacritic score of 75 or more = 7

Going by my opinion, I counted correctly: the PS3 has more good exclusives than the Wii.

[Darth Daver]

Originally Posted by Dax

Going by my opinion, I counted correctly: the PS3 has more good exclusives than the Wii.

Unfortunately Dax, your opinion counts for nothing in comparison to the many review scores that metacritic use. You've got to learn to accept that other people have different opinions to you and that you are not always correct, in fact far from it.

[2pro4show]

Originally Posted by Dax

Going by my opinion, I counted correctly: the PS3 has more good exclusives than the Wii.

Unfortunately that doesn't count for much.

But if we weren't talking exclusives, PS3 rapes Wii and 360 anal rapes both of them.

[PirateThom]

360 has an obscene number of games on PC....