An increase in food means an increase in population.

[Darth Alec]

Originally Posted by InsightGoalie

Lol, contradiction much?

Education as in education in general/for menn.

Not saying that I have anything against female education, but women with education and jobs wait longer to get kids.

[Junkie13]

Survival of the fittest? We're animals after all

[Mallhew]

Originally Posted by E6600

Unlike most liberals, socialists and commies, I believe the more people the merrier. I don't go running around with my hands in the air worrying about the increasing population. I see it as a good sign, I'd be more worried if our population decreased.

And this is why I can never like you. Especially if you've reviewed the facts and just feel 'the more the merrier' anyway.

Think about it this way: an increased population has to be sustained by food. This food has to have room to grow. The wildlife we clear out to make room for more food leads to less biological diversity. And you may not be a liberal who cares a damned bit about "the poor animals," but what happens when a disease emerges that kills off all the grains we've been making? Now we've not only screwed ourselves over, but biological diversity, too, making life on earth, human or otherwise, much harder to sustain.

[Mallhew]

Originally Posted by Junkie13

Survival of the fittest? We're animals after all

But the thing is, if we only leave corn fields left alive for us to eat, and then a crop disease kills the corn, we won't be able to eat anything else, because we killed what was getting in the way of corn.

[Junkie13]

Go to Macdonalds?
Sarcasm aside, I'm not sure if I agree with it, I think countries shouldn't limit there food, but distribute it to other countries, set up more access to food and clean water in other countries... easier said then done as people are to greedy.

Or they could turn to cannibalism which is always good.