|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| Fedora was a more user-friendly version of Redhat. By the sounds of it, CentOS is almost the same thing, except it's more its own distro, rather than an extension of Red Hat.
|
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| What about PC-BSD? It is not GNU/Linux, instead it is based on FreeBSD. I'm really thinking of giving it a try, my only problem with it is KDE. I prefer GNOME ![]() I've read/heard that BSD is more secure and stable than GNU/Linux, something I need for my 24/7 always on PC.
__________________ My Blog: 302 Found Quote:
|
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
| I'd say Linux is more than stable for pretty much all users. BSD is pretty bulletproof, but it lacks the ease of use and support that GNU/Linux has.
|
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
But kiss your awesome hardware support goodbye. Even enterprise-level internet servers run Linux these days. It's quite stable. |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| I know FreeBSD isn't user friendly, getting X to work on it takes about 20 hours (no kidding) and that's the point of PC-BSD. To bring FreeBSD to the masses. I've read what they have to say in their homepage and read some reviews about PC-BSD, and it seems to be very useable. Even their package manager as I've read is supposed to be easy and out of the box ready to use. Anyway, once (if) I try it, I'll let you know. I can get easily frustrated so if PC-BSD isn't set up and ready in 30 minutes after install, I'll purge it out of my drive.
__________________ My Blog: 302 Found Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |