Echochrome info

[Romanc]

Originally Posted by 2pro4show

So your saying a PSN title justifies the purchase of a 600$ console?

Well, carry on then...

If I understand you correctly, you mean that the delivery method of the game actually matters. If it wasn't so lame, I would laugh until out of breath

A good game is a good game, regardless.

*carrying on..*

[Fyrus]

Originally Posted by Axeus

Wait a min... how can somthing creative, fun, and interesting not be a good reason to own a console? The Wii must be a piece of shit in your opinion.

Lol the wii does have a lot of shit on it, and most of its is not creative or fun. I have one I would know.

Also its a downloadable game from PSN. If it was a full featured $60 game then there might be something here. But I don't considere a downloadable game any reason to own any console. People said Geometry wars made a 360 purchase viable, but I really didn't play it that much with Call of Duty 2, then Fight Night, then Oblivion.

ANd Icemage: cashman was hyping it.

[ca$hman]

Originally Posted by Fyrus

Its looks very creative, fun, and interesting, but if this is one of the top reasons to own a PS3, thats kinda sad.

no its not. I consider geometry wars one of the top reasons to own a 360.

[Fyrus]

Originally Posted by ca$hman

no its not. I consider geometry wars one of the top reasons to own a 360.

Well it all comes down to onions in the end doesn't it. I rarely play geometry wars, and when I do its only for a couple minute.s

[Icemage]

Originally Posted by Fyrus

Well it all comes down to onions in the end doesn't it. I rarely play geometry wars, and when I do its only for a couple minute.s

I consider Super Stardust HD to be superior to Geometry Wars in every way, but I'd still say it's not a reason to buy a PS3. Ditto for EchoChrome. Spending 50-100 times the cost of a game on hardware just to play the game is asinine.

Now if there are other things you want to play besides those games, then we're in the ballpark of believable.

[Fyrus]

Originally Posted by Icemage

I consider Super Stardust HD to be superior to Geometry Wars in every way, but I'd still say it's not a reason to buy a PS3. Ditto for EchoChrome. Spending 50-100 times the cost of a game on hardware just to play the game is asinine.

Now if there are other things you want to play besides those games, then we're in the ballpark of believable.

Super Stardust HD? The name makes it less cool than Geometry wars.

[Dax]

Originally Posted by Fyrus

Super Stardust HD? The name makes it less cool than Geometry wars.

Yes, we should all base the quality of games by their names.
The Orange Box? That makes it less cool than Halo 3.

[2pro4show]

Originally Posted by Romanc

If I understand you correctly, you mean that the delivery method of the game actually matters. If it wasn't so lame, I would laugh until out of breath

A good game is a good game, regardless.

*carrying on..*

No it doesn't. But if EchoChrome was a retail game don't try to tell me it would cost 60$ or whatever full-fledged PS3 titles cost. It's intended to be a small game so it belongs on PSN.

That said, would you pay 600$ to play a PSN title? Hell I wouldn't pay 600$ to play a PS3 title. 1 game doesn't seem like a very good reason to buy something so expensive. That's like buying a huge fridge to keep your one can of beer cold.

[Dax]

Originally Posted by 2pro4show

No it doesn't. But if EchoChrome was a retail game don't try to tell me it would cost 60$ or whatever full-fledged PS3 titles cost. It's intended to be a small game so it belongs on PSN.

That said, would you pay 600$ to play a PSN title? Hell I wouldn't pay 600$ to play a PS3 title. 1 game doesn't seem like a very good reason to buy something so expensive. That's like buying a huge fridge to keep your one can of beer cold.

I would say a carton of milk, maybe two.

[cyclone87]

Originally Posted by 2pro4show

1 game doesn't seem like a very good reason to buy something so expensive. That's like buying a huge fridge to keep your one can of beer cold.

Edit: Withdrawn.